[{"name":"证据法学","count":342,"id":1},{"name":"医事法律","count":171,"id":2},{"name":"医疗纠纷与诉讼","count":158,"id":3},{"name":"法医学理论与实践","count":145,"id":4},{"name":"法医学鉴定理论与实践","count":119,"id":5},{"name":"案例报告","count":80,"id":6},{"name":"证据科学","count":80,"id":7},{"name":"Theory and Practice of Forensic Medicine","count":64,"id":8},{"name":"法律精神医学","count":63,"id":9},{"name":"法庭科学","count":56,"id":10},{"name":"Law in Medical Practice","count":55,"id":11},{"name":"案例分析","count":44,"id":12},{"name":"论著","count":41,"id":13},{"name":"论坛","count":35,"id":14},{"name":"Malpractice and Lawsuit","count":24,"id":15},{"name":"证据科学讲堂","count":19,"id":16},{"name":"综述","count":18,"id":17},{"name":"学位论文","count":17,"id":18},{"name":"医疗事故处理条例专题讨论","count":15,"id":19},{"name":"江苏省法院系统专题","count":15,"id":20},{"name":"民事证据司法解释专题","count":13,"id":21},{"name":"“审判中心与证据法的发展”笔谈","count":12,"id":22},{"name":"医疗损害诉讼证据专题","count":12,"id":23},{"name":"消息","count":11,"id":24},{"name":"经验交流","count":10,"id":25},{"name":"司法文明指数研究","count":9,"id":26},{"name":"新《刑事诉讼法》中的证据问题","count":9,"id":27},{"name":"Forensic Psychiarty","count":8,"id":28},{"name":"Forensic Psychiatry","count":8,"id":29},{"name":"人物述林","count":8,"id":30},{"name":"医疗事故鉴定专题","count":8,"id":31},{"name":"“最高人民法院三项规程中的证据制度”专家笔谈","count":7,"id":32},{"name":"医事法津","count":7,"id":33},{"name":"参阅资料:国外有关医疗纠纷的文献摘要","count":7,"id":34},{"name":"国外参阅资料","count":7,"id":35},{"name":"心脏损伤鉴定专题","count":7,"id":36},{"name":"医疗纠纷诉讼证据专号","count":6,"id":37},{"name":"博士生论坛","count":6,"id":38},{"name":"参阅资料：医疗纠纷病理剖检专题","count":6,"id":39},{"name":"技术交流","count":6,"id":40},{"name":"焦点评论","count":6,"id":41},{"name":"病例报告","count":6,"id":42},{"name":"立法动态","count":6,"id":43},{"name":"经验交流与问题反映","count":6,"id":44},{"name":"\"案结事了\"与证据法专题","count":5,"id":45},{"name":"Comment on Typical Medical Malpractice Cases","count":5,"id":46},{"name":"“司法鉴定程序通则”专题","count":5,"id":47},{"name":"人体损伤程度鉴定标准专题","count":5,"id":48},{"name":"人体损伤致残程度标准专题","count":5,"id":49},{"name":"会议综述","count":5,"id":50},{"name":"刑事诉讼法修改专题","count":5,"id":51},{"name":"医疗法律证据专题","count":5,"id":52},{"name":"医疗纠纷预防和处理条例证据专题","count":5,"id":53},{"name":"国外法医学","count":5,"id":54},{"name":"山东聊城法院专题","count":5,"id":55},{"name":"新道路交通伤残鉴定标准专题","count":5,"id":56},{"name":"民事证据专题","count":5,"id":57},{"name":"第二届全国证据科学博士生博士后学术论坛优秀论文专题","count":5,"id":58},{"name":"美国刑事证据专题","count":5,"id":59},{"name":"论 著","count":5,"id":60},{"name":"证据科学博士生论坛","count":5,"id":61},{"name":"医疗证据专题","count":4,"id":62},{"name":"实施新刑诉法专题","count":4,"id":63},{"name":"监察法证据专题","count":4,"id":64},{"name":"网络犯罪证据专题","count":4,"id":65},{"name":"论 坛","count":4,"id":66},{"name":"非法行医专题","count":4,"id":67},{"name":"非法证据排除专题","count":4,"id":68},{"name":"专论","count":3,"id":69},{"name":"专题","count":3,"id":70},{"name":"抽样证明专题","count":3,"id":71},{"name":"证据法与交叉学科专题","count":3,"id":72},{"name":"述评","count":3,"id":73},{"name":"2009年证据科学博士生论坛","count":2,"id":74},{"name":"Degree Thesis","count":2,"id":75},{"name":"书写时间鉴定专题","count":2,"id":76},{"name":"伤残评定理论研究","count":2,"id":77},{"name":"博士生论坛论文选登","count":2,"id":78},{"name":"民事诉讼委托鉴定司法指导文件专题","count":2,"id":79},{"name":"法律与医学新视点","count":2,"id":80},{"name":"法律法规","count":2,"id":81},{"name":"规范·指南·共识","count":2,"id":82},{"name":"证据科学博士生论坛论文选登","count":2,"id":83},{"name":"Aboard Reference","count":1,"id":84},{"name":"“司法文明指数”专题","count":1,"id":85},{"name":"专家述评","count":1,"id":86},{"name":"中国证据法治年度综述","count":1,"id":87},{"name":"任务述林","count":1,"id":88},{"name":"信息","count":1,"id":89},{"name":"医疗诉讼判例评论","count":1,"id":90},{"name":"医疗诉讼判决评论","count":1,"id":91},{"name":"域外法制","count":1,"id":92},{"name":"域外资料","count":1,"id":93},{"name":"总目录","count":1,"id":94},{"name":"法医学鉴定体制","count":1,"id":95},{"name":"综 述","count":1,"id":96},{"name":"编委评论","count":1,"id":97},{"name":"讲座","count":1,"id":98},{"name":"资料库","count":1,"id":99}]
