[{"name":"论文","count":219,"id":1},{"name":"专题","count":98,"id":2},{"name":"Articles","count":26,"id":3},{"name":"专论","count":16,"id":4},{"name":"个人信息保护法","count":13,"id":5},{"name":"Property Law Issues in China's Civil Code","count":12,"id":6},{"name":"民法典物权编的重大疑难问题","count":12,"id":7},{"name":"论坛","count":12,"id":8},{"name":"印度法专题","count":11,"id":9},{"name":"印度法研究","count":10,"id":10},{"name":"新时代法学期刊的使命和责任","count":10,"id":11},{"name":"民法典专题","count":10,"id":12},{"name":"Special Discussions","count":9,"id":13},{"name":"Special Topic","count":9,"id":14},{"name":"论评","count":9,"id":15},{"name":"Discussions & Comments","count":8,"id":16},{"name":"再向数据法学","count":8,"id":17},{"name":"外国法治研究","count":8,"id":18},{"name":"民法典·物权编的立法论","count":8,"id":19},{"name":"评论","count":8,"id":20},{"name":"Revising the Code of Civil Procedure: The Voice of","count":7,"id":21},{"name":"《民事诉讼法》修改:学者的声音","count":7,"id":22},{"name":"《民法典合同编通则解释》专题","count":7,"id":23},{"name":"专题絮语","count":7,"id":24},{"name":"公司法修改","count":7,"id":25},{"name":"民法典编纂的愿景与构想","count":7,"id":26},{"name":"评析","count":6,"id":27},{"name":"财税改革与法治建设","count":6,"id":28},{"name":"Comments","count":5,"id":29},{"name":"〔专 题〕公司重组法的中日对话","count":5,"id":30},{"name":"〔论 文〕","count":5,"id":31},{"name":"不能犯理论的最前线","count":5,"id":32},{"name":"书评","count":5,"id":33},{"name":"关于WTO的追问","count":5,"id":34},{"name":"比较法专题","count":5,"id":35},{"name":"环境法学:拥抱生态文明的新兴交叉学科","count":5,"id":36},{"name":"疫情防控与法治","count":5,"id":37},{"name":"Commentaries & Analyses","count":4,"id":38},{"name":"Forum","count":4,"id":39},{"name":"Special Topic: The Principle of Culpability in Cri","count":4,"id":40},{"name":"专题:侵权法的历史谱系与解释展开","count":4,"id":41},{"name":"专题书评:建设中国文明的法律智慧","count":4,"id":42},{"name":"刑法学问题辑要","count":4,"id":43},{"name":"司法研究","count":4,"id":44},{"name":"外国法制研究","count":4,"id":45},{"name":"外国法研究","count":4,"id":46},{"name":"法政理念与现代社会","count":4,"id":47},{"name":"Party Rule versus Judges' Power","count":3,"id":48},{"name":"Studies of Rule of Law in Foreign Countries","count":3,"id":49},{"name":"侵权法专题","count":3,"id":50},{"name":"信守与省思:现行宪法颁布30周年纪念专题","count":3,"id":51},{"name":"司法的制度与问题","count":3,"id":52},{"name":"外国法与比较法研究","count":3,"id":53},{"name":"Judicial System","count":2,"id":54},{"name":"Serial","count":2,"id":55},{"name":"Studies on Foreign Legal Systems","count":2,"id":56},{"name":"Studies on the Rule of Law in Foreign Countries","count":2,"id":57},{"name":"争鸣","count":2,"id":58},{"name":"刊首语","count":2,"id":59},{"name":"劳动法理论的点与面","count":2,"id":60},{"name":"司法制度","count":2,"id":61},{"name":"文献研究","count":2,"id":62},{"name":"时政评述","count":2,"id":63},{"name":"特稿","count":2,"id":64},{"name":"联袂研讨:慈善与法","count":2,"id":65},{"name":"联袂研讨:有关车的法学新论","count":2,"id":66},{"name":"视点:法律移植的历史反思","count":2,"id":67},{"name":"连载","count":2,"id":68},{"name":"Analyses & Debates","count":1,"id":69},{"name":"Case Analysis and Legal Principles","count":1,"id":70},{"name":"Case Comments","count":1,"id":71},{"name":"Demonstration and Refutation","count":1,"id":72},{"name":"Editorial Remarks","count":1,"id":73},{"name":"Foreign Legal Theory","count":1,"id":74},{"name":"Foreign Legislation and Adjudication","count":1,"id":75},{"name":"Research and Investigation","count":1,"id":76},{"name":"Tsinghua Centenary Celebration Remarks","count":1,"id":77},{"name":"〔书 评〕","count":1,"id":78},{"name":"专稿","count":1,"id":79},{"name":"主编絮语","count":1,"id":80},{"name":"主编致辞","count":1,"id":81},{"name":"判例研究","count":1,"id":82},{"name":"外国法学理论","count":1,"id":83},{"name":"外国立法与司法","count":1,"id":84},{"name":"学术访谈","count":1,"id":85},{"name":"析辨","count":1,"id":86},{"name":"校庆专稿","count":1,"id":87},{"name":"案例分析与法理","count":1,"id":88},{"name":"案例研析","count":1,"id":89},{"name":"案例评说","count":1,"id":90},{"name":"法律时评","count":1,"id":91},{"name":"百年校庆寄语","count":1,"id":92},{"name":"第十一届全国公法博士生论坛优秀论文选登","count":1,"id":93},{"name":"观察与思考","count":1,"id":94},{"name":"证论与反驳","count":1,"id":95},{"name":"译文","count":1,"id":96},{"name":"读书","count":1,"id":97},{"name":"调查研究","count":1,"id":98}]
